Des Moines, Iowa-Based Principal Financial Group's Top-Tier Executives Average Pay Raise Was a Very Clean, Robust 14.4% Per Year During the Past 10 Years (2009-2018)

After the second Democratic 2020 Presidential candidate debate held in Detroit where Cory Booker was the standout performer, where several other non-top-tier candidates performed exceptionally well especially Steve Bullock and where most of the top-tier candidates stumbled, I now will turn my attention to the early primary States and start with Iowa.

The key issue to Iowa citizens should be the huge and continuing Income Inequality Expansion which is at the core of many critical problems the US faces.

Thus I will be doing research and making posts on the average pay raise per year that the Top-Tier Executives of the larger Iowa Companies were rewarded with in the past ten years.

The second Iowa Company I am addressing is Principal Financial Group.

From annual compensation information contained in Company Proxy Statement filings with the SEC, the chart at the very bottom below shows Principal Financial Group's Top-Tier Executives Annual Total Compensation for each of two consecutive full years of employment for the most recent ten years. 

Principal Financial Group's Top-Tier Executive Average Pay Raise was a very clean, robust 14.4% per year for the last ten years, much higher than Rockwell Collins Inc's 9.0%.

The only highly effective US Government law enacted by either party in the past decade that has substantially reduced income inequality expansion is Obamacare and the political right is continually trying to repeal and replace it and three of the top four Democratic Presidential candidates now leading in the polls are effectively running as their principal issue to do in essence precisely the same thing ..... repeal and replace Obamacare ..... but to do it with either a pure or a version of Medicare For All.  The pure Medicare For All advocated by both Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren and which was co-sponsored in a US Senate bill by Kamala Harris is off-the-charts enormously expensive and would take up an enormous amount of wasted time with no positive result since it has no chance of getting passed legislatively.  Just given their near-sighted stance on Medicare For All, if the Democratic nominee is any of the three of them, it will be extremely difficult for any of them to beat Trump in the general election.  It is that simple. 

My objective is to get a better handle on just why the US and particularly here Iowa has such massive continuing Income Inequality Expansion ..... it appears to be predominantly about the relative long-term annual pay raise percentages for the executives of a Company vs the many non-executives employees of a Company, coupled with the stock price appreciation subsequent to the time the company executives were rewarded in their pay with stock equity compensation.

To fix Income Inequality driven mainly by Company and its Board of Director choices on Percentage Annual Pay Raises, the US Government should step in and pass wisely-designed, simple but effective Fair Pay Raise Income Inequality Narrowing Company tax incentives for rewarding non-executive employees with fair pay increases ..... the carrot ..... and Company tax disincentives for rewarding executive employees with clearly excessively high pay increases ..... the stick.  I am certain ..... it is simple math ..... that this tax proposal would be very effective in substantially reducing the huge income inequality expansion that has occurred for decades in annual percentage pay raises between company executives and the rest of the company employees. 

And the continuing annual net tax revenues raised by the US Government here should be set up in a separate fund to be used only for wise additional income inequality narrowing initiatives.  This fund should be run by an outside group made up entirely of minorities harmed the most by Income Inequality Expansion of the past decades  .....all women, all blacks, all Latinos, all other non-white people, all past and present union members, all LGBTQ, all non-employee contract workers and all middle and lower income people of all ages, including those retired.

Also, the US Government should require all US Corporate Boards to include at least one worker representative and to exclude any Company Executive.

	FYE	FYE		FYE	FYE		FYE	FYE		FYE	FYE		FYE	FYE
	Dec	Dec		Dec	Dec		Dec	Dec		Dec	Dec		Dec	Dec
Principal Financial Group	2018	2017		2017	2016		2016	2015		2015	2014		2014	2013
Top-Tier	Total	Total		Total	Total		Total	Total		Total	Total		Total	Total
Executive	Comp	Comp		Comp	Comp		Comp	Comp		Comp	Comp		Comp	Comp
	$ 000s	$ 000s		$ 000s	$ 000s		$ 000s	$ 000s		$ 000s	$ 000s		$ 000s	$ 000s
Houston CEO	12,227	11,959		11,959	8,971		8,971	5,205		5,205	5,473		5,473	3,649
Strable-Soethout	3,454	3,793		3,793	2,535		N/A	N/A
Dunbar	2,564	2,867		2,867	2,809		N/A	N/A
Halter	N/A	N/A
McCaughan	N/A	N/A		6,034	4,873		4,873	4,420		4,420	6,887		6,887	5,029
Valdes	2,859	2,976		2,976	2,668		2,668	2,559		2,559	3,666		3,666	2,445
Lillis CFO				N/A	N/A		3,585	2,712		2,712	5,686		5,686	3,479
Zimpleman Former CEO										10,272	16,919		16,919	9,035
Totals	21,104	21,595		27,629	21,856		20,097	14,896		25,168	38,631		38,631	23,637
Annual % Change vs Prior Year	-2.3%			26.4%			34.9%			-34.9%			63.4%
5 Year Average Per Year % Change		17.5%
	FYE	FYE		FYE	FYE		FYE	FYE		FYE	FYE		FYE	FYE
	Dec	Dec		Dec	Dec		Dec	Dec		Dec	Dec		Dec	Dec
Principal Financial Group	2013	2012		2012	2011		2011	2010		2010	2009		2009	2008
Top-Tier	Total	Total		Total	Total		Total	Total		Total	Total		Total	Total
Executive	Comp	Comp		Comp	Comp		Comp	Comp		Comp	Comp		Comp	Comp
	$ 000s	$ 000s		$ 000s	$ 000s		$ 000s	$ 000s		$ 000s	$ 000s		$ 000s	$ 000s
Zimpleman CEO	9,035	10,610		10,610	9,206		9,206	8,247		8,247	4,909		4,909	6,533
McCaughan	5,029	4,340		4,340	3,720		3,720	4,221		4,221	3,608		3,608	3,296
Houston President	3,599	4,265		4,265	3,425		3,425	3,143		3,143	2,295		2,295	1,915
Lillis CFO	3,479	3,722		3,722	2,620		2,620	2,130		2,130	1,068		1,068	1,126
Valdes	2,445	2,099		N/A	N/A
Sorensen Chairman International							1,968	2,182		2,182	1,598		1,598	1,721
Aschenbrenner													2,670	3,600
Totals	23,587	25,036		22,937	18,971		20,939	19,923		19,923	13,478		16,148	18,191
Annual % Change vs Prior Year	-5.8%			20.9%			5.1%			47.8%			-11.2%
5 Year Average Per Year % Change		11.4%
10 Year Average Per Year % Change		14.4%