Saturday, August 10, 2019

North Charleston, South Carolina-Based Manufacturer Ingevity Corp's Top-Tier Executives Average Pay Raise Was a Very Robust 13.8% Per Year During the Past Five Years (2014-2018)

After the second Democratic 2020 Presidential candidate debate held in Detroit where Cory Booker was the standout performer, where several other non-top-tier candidates performed exceptionally well especially Steve Bullock and where most of the top-tier candidates stumbled, I now will turn my attention to the early primary States and I already finished both Iowa and New Hampshire Companies so now I have moved on to South Carolina Companies.

The key issue to South Carolina citizens should be the huge and continuing Income Inequality Expansion which is at the core of many critical problems the US faces.

Thus I will be doing research and making posts on the average pay raise per year that the Top-Tier Executives of South Carolina Companies were rewarded with in the past ten years.

The 4th South Carolina Company I am addressing here is Ingevity Corp, which was a 2015 Spinoff from WestRock.  There are only five years of Top-Tier Executive Compensation information which have been filed with the SEC in Company Proxy Statements and in a Company 10-12B/A related to this 2015 Spinoff.

From annual compensation information contained in Company Proxy Statement and 10-12B/A filings with the SEC, the chart at the bottom below shows Ingevity Corp's Top-Tier Executives Annual Total Compensation for each of two consecutive full years of employment for the past five years. 

Ingevity Corp's Top-Tier Executives Average Pay Raise was a very robust 13.8% per year for the last five years, which was the third highest of the four largest South Carolina Companies I have addressed so far.


  1. Blackbaud +27.0% per year for the past five years
  2. Sonono Products Co +14.4% per year for the past ten years
  3. Ingevity Corp +13.8% per year for the past five years
  4. SCANA +7.4% per year for nine years 

The only highly effective US Government law enacted by either party in the past decade that has substantially reduced income inequality expansion is Obamacare and the political right is continually trying to repeal and replace it and three of the top four Democratic Presidential candidates now leading in the polls are effectively running as their principal issue to do in essence precisely the same thing ..... repeal and replace Obamacare ..... but to do it with either a pure or a version of Medicare For All.  The pure Medicare For All advocated by both Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren and which was co-sponsored in a US Senate bill by Kamala Harris is off-the-charts enormously expensive and would take up an enormous amount of wasted time with no positive result since it has no chance of getting passed legislatively.  Just given their near-sighted stance on Medicare For All, if the Democratic nominee is any of the three of them, it will be extremely difficult for any of them to beat Trump in the general election.  It is that simple. 

My objective is to get a better handle on just why the US and particularly here South Carolina has such massive continuing Income Inequality Expansion ..... it appears to be predominantly about the relative long-term annual pay raise percentages for the executives of a Company vs the many non-executive employees of a Company, coupled with the stock price appreciation subsequent to the time the company executives were rewarded in their pay with stock equity compensation.

To fix Income Inequality driven mainly by Company and its Board of Director choices on Percentage Annual Pay Raises, the US Government should step in and pass wisely-designed, simple but effective Fair Pay Raise Income Inequality Narrowing Company tax incentives for rewarding non-executive employees with fair pay increases ..... the carrot ..... and Company tax disincentives for rewarding executive employees with clearly excessively high pay increases ..... the stick.  I am certain ..... it is simple math ..... that this tax proposal would be very effective in substantially reducing the huge income inequality expansion that has occurred for decades in annual percentage pay raises between company executives and the rest of the company employees. 

And the continuing annual net tax revenues raised by the US Government here should be set up in a separate fund to be used only for wise additional income inequality narrowing initiatives.  This fund should be run by an outside group made up entirely of minorities harmed the most by Income Inequality Expansion of the past decades  .....all women, all blacks, all Latinos, all other non-white people, all past and present union members, all LGBTQ, all non-employee contract workers and all middle and lower income people of all ages, including those retired.

Also, the US Government should require all US Corporate Boards to include at least one worker representative and to exclude any Company Executive.

FYE FYE FYE FYE FYE FYE FYE FYE FYE FYE
Dec Dec Dec Dec Dec Dec Dec Dec Dec Dec
Ingevity Corp 2018 2017 2017 2016 2016 2015 2015 2014 2014 2013
Top-Tier Total Total Total Total Total Total Total Total Total Total
Executive Comp Comp Comp Comp Comp Comp Comp Comp Comp Comp
$ 000s $ 000s $ 000s $ 000s $ 000s $ 000s $ 000s $ 000s $ 000s $ 000s
Michael Wilson CEO       5,423       4,858       4,858       6,100  N/A   N/A 
John Fortson CFO       2,219       2,134       2,134       3,352  N/A   N/A 
Katherine Burgeson General Counsel       1,330       1,223       1,223       1,200       1,200          959          959       1,112       1,112          601
Michael Smith Pres Performance Chemicals       1,662       1,149  N/A   N/A     
Edward Woodcock Pres Performance Matrls       1,097       1,019       1,019          786          786          573          573          719          719          393
Edward Rose Pres Performance Chemicals  N/A   N/A        1,117       1,196       1,196       1,684       1,679          914
               
 Totals      11,731     10,383       9,234     11,438       3,103       2,728       2,728       3,515       3,510       1,908
Annual % Change vs Prior Year 13.0% -19.3% 13.7% -22.4% 84.0%
 5 Year Average Per Year % Change 13.8%