The exceptionally successful, well-run Amazon's Top-Tier Executives Average Annual Pay Raise of a completely off-the-charts 659.0% per year over the past 10 years is even more than double that of the highest of the 30 Dow Industrial Companies Apple's off-the-charts 306.1% per year and more than 20 times that of the second highest of these Dow Industrial Companies Microsoft's blistering 32.4% per year.
To fix Income Inequality driven mainly by Company and its Board of Director choices on Percentage Annual Pay Raises, the US Government should step in and pass wisely-designed Fair Pay Raise Income Inequality Narrowing Organization tax incentives ..... the carrot ..... and Organization wise tax disincentives ..... the stick.
Let me explain how a very effective Fair Pay Raise Income Inequality Narrowing Organization Tax Incentives and Tax Disincentives proposal might work. The tax percentages and five quintiles used are just my first thoughts and could easily be changed to make sure all parties are impacted fairly.
For decades, the
overwhelming majority of US Organizations have implemented continuing employee
compensation policies that have effectively resulted in continuing and massive
income inequality expansion harming lower and mid-level US employees,
especially women, blacks, Latinos, other non-white people, LGBTQ workers, hospital and other health care workers, Non-employee contract workers, present and past union members, low and middle income retirees, and yes also many low and middle income white men, including those working in
the Midwest Industrial Rust Belt.
And also for decades,
neither political party of the US Government has done anything of substance to
effectively address this discrimination in continuing pay.
One of the best ways to
curtail massive and continuing income inequality expansion, which is wreaking
economic havoc on many US employees, is through what I call The Organization Fair
Wage Tax Adjustment. It is US Capitalism Done Right, Where All Organization Employees Benefit, Not Just the Ones at the Top Rung of the Ladder. Here's how
it might work.
Every for-profit US Organization (Corporation, Partnership, REIT, etc) and US non-profit Organization above a certain size would be required annually to break out its annual total US employee
compensation just of its employees working in both the current full year and
also in the previous full year. The gold-standard Employee Compensation measure
is defined by the US SEC and publicly-held companies must use it in their
annual proxy statements filed with SEC.
These two-year continuing
full-year employee total compensation amounts are then broken down into five
equal US dollars total employee compensation quintile groups.
These five quintile
groups would be equal in total US dollars but logically the top two quintile
groups combined should have less than 10% of the total number of US Organization employees and the lower three quintile groups combined should have more than
90% of the total number of US Organization employees.
The Organization would then be
assessed a US federal tax at 60% of the total actual annual increase in total
employee compensation as defined above of the top quintile group and at 10% of
the total actual annual increase in total annual employee compensation of the
second-to-the-top quintile group.
At the same time, the Organization would be rewarded with a US federal tax credit at 40% of the total
actual annual increase in total employee compensation of the bottom quintile
group, at 20% of the total actual annual increase in total employee
compensation of the second-to-the bottom quintile group, and at 10% of the
total actual annual increase in total employee compensation of the middle
quintile group.
End result, the Organization giving percentage of total employee compensation raises fairly to all US
employees won't pay a dime of additional tax and US Income Inequality would not
expand.
And if the Organization elected to give higher percentage raises in total actual employee compensation
to its lower-paid employees than to its higher-paid employees, it would be
rewarded with a net US federal tax credit in the aggregate, which has the
potential of being quite lucrative, and US income inequality would finally narrow.
To summarize the end
result, the higher the income inequality expansion in one year, the higher the
net tax owed by the Organization to the US Government. And the higher the income
inequality narrowing in one year, the higher the net tax credit rewarded to the Organization.
Adequate controls and stiff
penalties would be needed in this legislation to ensure that creative Organization CFOs, outside auditors and outside management consultants are
not able to game the system here.
This critically needed
Fair Pay proposal is what I call incredibly fair to all parties impacted and so
will a huge majority of all US citizens.
Further, US consumer
spending and US GDP growth will both get a significant boost from the resultant
higher pay raises in the hands of Organization employees in the three lower total
employee compensation quintile groups.
Nancy Pelosi should
consider calling for a US House vote on legislation for this. Republican House
members voting against it will have a very difficult time justifying their vote
to their District citizens. It would probably result in a huge increase in the
number of Democrats in the US House in 2020.
And when the US House
sends this legislation to the US Senate, if the US Senate refuses to call for a
vote on such a popular piece of legislation on this critical fair pay raise
issue, there will also probably be a very significant increase in the number of
Democrats in the US Senate in 2020.
In addition, progressive
US States should consider introducing legislation on their own Fair Pay State
Tax Adjustment somewhat similar to the above Fair Pay Federal Tax proposal, but
the tax percentages should probably be a bit lower than the above tax
percentages.
And the continuing annual net tax revenues raised by the US Government here should be set up in a separate fund to be used only for wise additional income inequality narrowing initiatives. This fund should be run by an outside group made up entirely of minorities harmed the most by Income Inequality Expansion of the past decades .....all women, all blacks, all Latinos, all other non-white people, all past and present union members, all LGBTQ, all US State and Local Government employees, all non-employee contract workers and all middle and lower income people of all ages.
Also, the US Government should require all US Corporate Boards to include at least one worker representative and to exclude any Company Executive.
I just recently have researched and made posts on Top-Tier Executives Average Annual Pay Raise per year for each of the 30 Dow Industrial Companies. Amazon here is the first of many large non-Dow Companies I will be making similar posts on in order to get an even better handle on just why the US has such massive continuing Income Inequality Expansion ..... it appears to be predominantly about the relative long-term annual pay raise percentages.
FYE | FYE | FYE | FYE | FYE | FYE | FYE | FYE | FYE | FYE | |||||
Dec | Dec | Dec | Dec | Dec | Dec | Dec | Dec | Dec | Dec | |||||
Amazon.com | 2018 | 2017 | 2017 | 2016 | 2016 | 2015 | 2015 | 2014 | 2014 | 2013 | ||||
Top-Tier | Total | Total | Total | Total | Total | Total | Total | Total | Total | Total | ||||
Executive | Comp | Comp | Comp | Comp | Comp | Comp | Comp | Comp | Comp | Comp | ||||
$ 000s | $ 000s | $ 000s | $ 000s | $ 000s | $ 000s | $ 000s | $ 000s | $ 000s | $ 000s | |||||
Jeffrey Bezos CEO | 1,682 | 1,682 | 1,682 | 1,682 | 1,682 | 1,682 | 1,682 | 1,682 | 1,682 | 1,682 | ||||
Brian Olsavsky SVP CFO | 6,933 | 163 | 163 | 4,559 | 4,559 | 7,787 | N/A | N/A | ||||||
Jeffrey Blackburn SVP Business Development | 10,400 | 179 | 179 | 22,194 | N/A | N/A | ||||||||
Andrew Jassy CEO Amazon Web Services | 19,733 | 194 | 194 | 35,610 | 35,610 | 175 | 175 | 7,665 | 7,665 | 163 | ||||
Jeffrey Wilke CEO Worldwide Consumer | 19,722 | 185 | 185 | 32,958 | 32,958 | 176 | 176 | 8,516 | 8,516 | 168 | ||||
Diego Piacentini SVP Intl Consumer Business | N/A | N/A | 231 | 6,866 | 6,866 | 231 | ||||||||
Thomas Szkutak Former SVP CFO | N/A | N/A | 5,962 | 163 | ||||||||||
Totals | 58,470 | 2,403 | 2,403 | 97,003 | 74,809 | 9,820 | 2,264 | 24,729 | 30,691 | 2,407 | ||||
Annual % Change From Prior Year | 2333.2% | -97.5% | 661.8% | -90.8% | 1175.1% | |||||||||
FYE | FYE | FYE | FYE | FYE | FYE | FYE | FYE | FYE | FYE | |||||
Dec | Dec | Dec | Dec | Dec | Dec | Dec | Dec | Dec | Dec | |||||
Amazon.com | 2013 | 2012 | 2012 | 2011 | 2011 | 2010 | 2010 | 2009 | 2009 | 2008 | ||||
Top-Tier | Total | Total | Total | Total | Total | Total | Total | Total | Total | Total | ||||
Executive | Comp | Comp | Comp | Comp | Comp | Comp | Comp | Comp | Comp | Comp | ||||
$ 000s | $ 000s | $ 000s | $ 000s | $ 000s | $ 000s | $ 000s | $ 000s | $ 000s | $ 000s | |||||
Jeffrey Bezos CEO | 1,682 | 1,682 | 1,682 | 1,682 | 1,682 | 1,682 | 1,682 | 1,782 | 1,782 | 1,282 | ||||
Andrew Jassy CEO Amazon Web Services | 163 | 11,612 | 11,612 | 163 | 163 | 6,629 | N/A | N/A | ||||||
Jeffrey Wilke CEO Worldwide Consumer | 168 | 17,728 | 17,728 | 168 | 168 | 7,191 | 7,191 | 163 | N/A | N/A | ||||
Diego Piacentini SVP Intl Consumer Business | 231 | 11,819 | 11,819 | 231 | 231 | 6,696 | 6,696 | 231 | 231 | 7,722 | ||||
Thomas Szkutak Former SVP CFO | 163 | 8,451 | 8,451 | 163 | 163 | 6,629 | 6,629 | 163 | 163 | 7,652 | ||||
Sebastian Gunningham SVP Seller Services | 440 | 940 | ||||||||||||
Totals | 2,407 | 51,292 | 51,292 | 2,407 | 2,407 | 28,827 | 22,198 | 2,339 | 2,616 | 17,596 | ||||
Annual % Change From Prior Year | -95.3% | 2031.0% | -91.7% | 849.0% | -85.1% | |||||||||
10 Year Average Per Year % Change | 659.0% |