Presently, all qualified defined contribution plans, as well as 
traditional IRAs, 403(a) or 403(b) annuity plans, and 457(b) government 
plans, must satisfy a minimum distribution requirement in which 
distribution of an employee's interest in the plan must begin by April 
1st of the calendar year following the later of (1) the calendar year in
 which the participant attains age 70 1/2 or (2) the calendar year in 
which the employee retires.
This is a reasonable plan for normal situations.
However, for retirement plans that have accumulated very large amounts 
of retirement assets, including the value of pension benefits, I think it is unreasonable, and even borders on 
being obscene, from a tax advantage standpoint.  It is another case of "Tax Deferrals Gone Wild", where the US Congress continues to legislate only for the wealthy, thereby further expanding the economic gap between the wealthy and everyone else.
And particularly when the country has a US Debt in excess of $16 
trillion, with large continuing annual US Deficits projected here on 
end, it is particularly unreasonable to permit very large retirement 
assets to continue to grow tax free and not have any distributed for an 
unreasonable additional period of time.
Thus, below here are my recommendations related to this issue. 
For all retirement plans where the fair market value of the 
participant's interest in all plans, including the value of pension benefits, exceed $50 mil on December 31 of the
 year the participant attains age 64 1/2, the minimum distribution 
requirement must start by April 1st in the calendar year the participant
 attains the age of 65 1/2.
For all retirement plans where the fair market value of the 
participant's interest in all plans, including the value of pension benefits, exceed $10 mil on December 31 of the
 year the participant attains age 65 1/2, but did not exceed $50 mil on 
December 31 of the year the participant attained age 64 1/2, the 
minimum 
distribution requirement must start by April 1st in the calendar year 
the participant attains the age of 66 1/2.
For all retirement plans where the fair market value of the 
participant's interest in all plans, including the value of pension benefits, exceed $5 mil, but are less than $10
 mil, on December 31 of the year the participant attains age 65 1/2, the
 minimum 
distribution requirement must start by April 1st in the calendar year 
the participant attains the age of 67 1/2.
For all retirement plans where the fair market value of the 
participant's interest in all plans, including the value of pension benefits, exceed $3 mil, but are less than $5 
mil, on December 31 of the year the participant attains age 65 1/2, the 
minimum 
distribution requirement must start on April 1st in the calendar year 
the participant attains the age of 68 1/2.
For all retirement plans where the fair market value of the 
participant's interest in all plans, including the value of pension benefits, exceed $2 mil, but are less than $3 
mil, on December 31 of the year the participant attains age 65 1/2, the 
minimum 
distribution requirement must start on April 1st in the calendar year 
the participant attains the age of 69 1/2.
And for all of the above situations, and also for all situations where 
the total assets in the qualified retirement plans, including the value of pension benefits, exceed $1 mil on 
December 31 of the year that the participant attains the age 65 1/2, my 
recommendation is to eliminate the second option, which permits the 
deferral of the minimum distribution requirement date due to the 
participant not being retired yet.
The economic harm to elderly US citizens of all of the above 
recommendations is substantially softened, since what is happening, for 
the most part, is simply paying US federal income taxes a bit earlier on
 income already earned, not paying more US federal income taxes in 
total.
All of the money raised here by the US Government as scored by the CBO 
over the next 10 years will be very substantial.  And the amount raised 
over the second 10 years will be substantially higher.  And thereafter, 
the money raised will continue to grow by leaps and bounds.  All of this
 money raised should be used to reduce the US Debt.