So how were these same earnings in annual 2011? Well, much better. The Total Non-GAAP Adjusted Net Income in annual 2011 increased 5% from annual 2010.
And all 6 Big Pharma Corps had their earnings change from the prior year deteriorate in 2012 vs 2011 as compared with such earnings change in 2011 vs 2010.
I think it is pretty clear that the Affordable Care Act played a very positive role in reducing the excess profits of all of these 6 Big Pharma Corps. At the same time, this new health care act has also bent back the long-term US health care cost curve.
This Adjusted After-tax Net Income above is what was disclosed in the company's earnings release, and it excludes Special, Unusual Items which are significant in amount relative to Reported Net Income.
Below here are the Adjusted After-tax Net Income of each of these 6 US Big Pharma Corps in the 4Qs of both 2012 and 2011:
4Q 2012 | 4Q 2011 | |||||||||
Non-GAAP | Non-GAAP | 4Q | 4Q | |||||||
Adjusted | Adjusted | Increase | Increase | |||||||
Net | Net | (Decrease) | (Decrease) | |||||||
Income | Income | Amount | % | |||||||
mils of $s | mils of $s | mils of $s | ||||||||
Big Pharma | ||||||||||
Pfizer | 3,512 | 3,784 | (272) | -7% | ||||||
Johnson & Johnson | 3,376 | 3,129 | 247 | 8% | ||||||
Merck | 2,540 | 2,978 | (438) | -15% | ||||||
Abbott Labs | 2,421 | 2,295 | 126 | 5% | ||||||
Eli Lilly | 945 | 969 | (24) | -2% | ||||||
Bristol Myers Squibb | 777 | 906 | (129) | -14% | ||||||
Total all 6 | 13,571 | 14,061 | (490) | -3% |
And below here are the Adjusted After-tax Net Income of each of these 6 US Big Pharma Corps in both annual 2012 and annual 2011. In addition, the two far right columns below compare the annual earnings growth or decline in 2012 vs 2011 and in 2011 vs 2010:
Annual | Annual | ||||
2012 | 2011 | Annual | Annual | Annual | |
Non-GAAP | Non-GAAP | 2012 | 2012 | 2011 | |
Adjusted | Adjusted | Increase | Increase | Increase | |
Net | Net | (Decrease) | (Decrease) | (Decrease) | |
Income | Income | Amount | % | % | |
mils of $s | mils of $s | mils of $s | |||
Big Pharma | |||||
Pfizer | 16,476 | 17,839 | (1,363) | -8% | 2% |
Johnson & Johnson | 14,345 | 13,867 | 478 | 3% | 4% |
Merck | 11,743 | 11,697 | 46 | 0% | 9% |
Abbott Labs | 8,119 | 7,331 | 788 | 11% | 13% |
Eli Lilly | 3,784 | 4,914 | (1,130) | -23% | -6% |
Bristol Myers Squibb | 3,364 | 3,921 | (557) | -14% | 5% |
Total all 6 | 57,831 | 59,569 | (1,738) | -3% | 5% |
And below here is the 2011 CEO Compensation disclosure in the most recent 2011 Proxy Statements filed by each of these Big Pharma Corps with the SEC:
Non-equity | Increase | |||||||
Incentive | In | All | ||||||
Stock | Option | Plan | Pension | Other | Total | |||
Salary | Awards | Awards | Compensation | Value | Compensation | Compensation | ||
000s | 000s | 000s | 000s | 000s | 000s | 000s | ||
Johnson & Johnson | Weldon | 1,907 | 2,609 | 4,189 | 14,336 | 3,435 | 321 | 26,797 |
Pfizer | Read | 1,700 | 5,684 | 6,916 | 3,500 | 6,893 | 319 | 25,012 |
Abbott Labs | White | 1,900 | 9,760 | 1,836 | 4,200 | 5,419 | 896 | 24,011 |
Eli Lilly | Lechleiter | 1,500 | 5,625 | 0 | 2,625 | 6,530 | 90 | 16,370 |
Bristol Myers Squibb | Andreotti | 1,510 | 7,352 | 0 | 4,220 | 1,180 | 650 | 14,912 |
Merck | Frazier | 1,500 | 3,108 | 3,000 | 3,097 | 2,587 | 56 | 13,348 |
Total all 6 | 10,017 | 34,138 | 15,941 | 31,978 | 26,044 | 2,332 | 120,450 |
It is good to see that 3 (Merck's Frazier, Bristol Myers Squibb's Andreotti and Eli Lilly's Lechleiter) of these 6 CEO's have Total Compensation at roughly half of that of the top 3. But then when you review the magnitude of the above Total Compensation amounts, which totaled $120 mil for just these 6 CEO's, it is also easy to see why so many US citizens feel that there is such incredible income inequality between the very wealthy in the country and everyone else.
And from their SEC income tax footnote filings, below here is the most recent year 2011 disclosure of the just one year (2011) of foreign tax breaks that each of these 6 Big Pharma companies received by having their foreign earnings taxed somewhere other than in the US. The foreign tax break amount here represents the difference between these foreign earnings taxed at their actual foreign income tax rates vs at the US Federal Income Tax Rate of 35%.
2011 | |
Foreign | |
Tax | |
Breaks | |
mils of $s | |
Merck | 2,220 |
Johnson & Johnson | 1,953 |
Abbott Labs | 1,191 |
Eli Lilly | 797 |
Pfizer | 421 |
Bristol Myers Squibb | 593 |
Total all 6 | 7,175 |
Yeah, that is $7.2 bil of foreign tax breaks for just the year 2011 for just these 6 Big Pharma Corps.
And below here are the cumulative unremitted foreign
earnings of these 6 Big Pharma Corps at Dec 31, 2011, the most recent date this number was disclosed. These unremitted foreign earnings result from the shifting of income, and the
related US jobs, to low taxed foreign jurisdictions.
Unremitted | |
Foreign | |
Earnings | |
12-31-11 | |
bils of $s | |
Pfizer | 63.0 |
Merck | 44.3 |
Johnson & Johnson | 41.6 |
Abbott Labs | 31.9 |
Eli Lilly | 20.6 |
Bristol Myers Squibb | 18.5 |
Total all 6 | 219.9 |
Yeah, that's total unremitted foreign earnings as of Dec 31, 2011 of $220 bil.
Clearly, US Big Pharma has benefited dramatically from many corporate tax loopholes.
It's easy to see why the country's largest companies like these Big Pharma Corps want the
US Debt to be reduced solely by US Government cost cuts rather than by a combination
of both costs cuts and additional US Tax Revenues.
And the Business Roundtable, which speaks for the largest US Corps, is now lobbying very heavily to delay first eligibility for both Social Security and Medicare Benefits to Age 70. Give me a break!
And the Business Roundtable, which speaks for the largest US Corps, is now lobbying very heavily to delay first eligibility for both Social Security and Medicare Benefits to Age 70. Give me a break!