- Up 13% Over 2012
- Up 20% Over 2011
- Up 33% Over 2010
- Up 148% Over 2009
- Up 1,827% Over 2008
- Up 63% Over 2007
Two Year Total Earnings: | |
….. 2013-14 | 2,253,528,000,000 |
….. 2008-09 | 492,803,000,000 |
………. Two Year Earnings Increase | |
…………....... Amount | 1,760,724,000,000 |
………………...... % | 357% |
BUT 2014 Total Audited Earnings:
- Down 8% From 2013
Below here are the total earnings of these 11 previous posts combined:
2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | |
US GAAP | US GAAP | US GAAP | US GAAP | US GAAP | US GAAP | US GAAP | US GAAP | |
Audited | Audited | Audited | Audited | Audited | Audited | Audited | Audited | |
Net | Net | Net | Net | Net | Net | Net | Net | |
Income | Income | Income | Income | Income | Income | Income | Income | |
100 US Company Largest Layer Totals | (Loss) | (Loss) | (Loss) | (Loss) | (Loss) | (Loss) | (Loss) | (Loss) |
$ mils | $ mils | $ mils | $ mils | $ mils | $ mils | $ mils | $ mils | |
100 Largest | 627,653 | 650,857 | 568,947 | 581,687 | 516,202 | 357,164 | 170,905 | 402,626 |
100 Second Largest (#101-#200) | 144,539 | 136,407 | 115,024 | 107,233 | 93,357 | 60,860 | 37,266 | 106,684 |
100 Third Largest (#201-#300) | 81,724 | 82,233 | 68,773 | 70,945 | 65,910 | 19,030 | (38,903) | 19,666 |
100 Fourth Largest (#301-#400) | 55,529 | 59,607 | 55,503 | 57,692 | 40,996 | 21,523 | (23,845) | 44,304 |
100 Fifth Largest (#401-#500) | 43,898 | 50,358 | 45,318 | 34,244 | 35,203 | 33,719 | 801 | 26,959 |
100 Sixth Largest (#501-#600) | 32,260 | 29,827 | 23,351 | 19,021 | 19,240 | 7,342 | (8,686) | 14,467 |
100 Seventh Largest (#601-#700) | 28,767 | 26,057 | 16,585 | 10,383 | 19,483 | 243 | (8,105) | 15,296 |
100 Eigth Largest (#701-#800) | 20,134 | 19,717 | 15,303 | 14,753 | 13,847 | 7,946 | (812) | 10,678 |
100 Ninth Largest (#801-#900) | 15,949 | 13,542 | 13,128 | 10,687 | 8,349 | (1,334) | (6,866) | 8,627 |
100 Tenth Largest (#901-#1000) | 10,890 | 10,572 | 7,648 | 3,669 | 6,329 | (1,150) | (4,915) | 5,671 |
100 Eleventh Largest (#1001-#1100) | 20,452 | 92,556 | 25,552 | (10,903) | (6,253) | (68,687) | (60,691) | 9,266 |
Total 1100 Largest US Companies | 1,081,795 | 1,171,733 | 955,132 | 899,411 | 812,663 | 436,656 | 56,149 | 664,244 |
Annual Earnings % Changes: | ||||||||
….. 2014 vs 2013 | -8% | |||||||
….. 2014 vs 2012 | 13% | |||||||
….. 2014 vs 2011 | 20% | |||||||
….. 2014 vs 2010 | 33% | |||||||
….. 2014 vs 2009 | 148% | |||||||
….. 2014 vs 2008 | 1827% | |||||||
….. 2014 vs 2007 | 63% | |||||||
Two Year Total Earnings: | ||||||||
….. 2013-14 | 2,253,528 | |||||||
….. 2008-09 | 492,803 | |||||||
………. Two Year Earnings Increase | ||||||||
………….. Amount | 1,760,725 | |||||||
………………. % | 357% |
From the above nearly all audited by very prestigious Big 4 CPA Firms US GAAP earnings numbers, it should be clear that the 1,100 largest US Companies have recovered miraculously from the 2008 worldwide financial meltdown. Their Total Audited US GAAP Earnings From Continuing Operations for the most recent year 2014 of $1,082 Bil were a monstrous 18 Times the 2008 Total US GAAP Audited Earnings of Only $56 Bil.
Not only have the Total Audited Earnings of these 1,100 largest US Companies recovered all that they lost with the 2008 financial meltdown, but they added another 63% from their previous annual high in 2007 before the financial meltdown hit.
It is pretty clear to me that the major drivers of this wholescale, massive earnings recovery from the disastrous 2008 financial meltdown were prescient steps taken by the Obama/Biden Administration and by the US Fed.
That's why financially astute people know that they want a continuation of the economic policies of the Obama/Biden Administration. The only way that is assured is if Joe Biden is the next US President.
There is a huge difference between someone running for President saying he or she will continue the Obama/Biden highly successful economic policies and someone actually sitting at the table and being a key participant in these economic policies for 8 years. Just sayin.
On the huge downside here, the Total Audited Earnings of these 1,100 largest US Companies for 2014 were down 8% from 2013. This points to the clear necessity of both the TransPacific and TransAtlantic Trade Partnerships to pass. The last thing the US economy needs is a President against these two key Trade Agreements.
But guess what? The two leading Democratic Presidential candidates and the leading Republican candidate have all boldly announced that they are against the TransPacific Trade Partnership.
I'll make a prediction. The next US President will be fervently for both the TransPacific and TransAtlantic Trade Agreements.
I think for someone to be against the TransPacific Partnership shows that either they don't really understand what is necessary for capitalism to work or are so ambitious that they are willing to take a position on a critical economic issue that would seriously harm the country just to get elected US President. Just sayin.
There clearly is a huge problem with US Income Inequality, but can you imagine how the US middle and lower economic classes would have fared if the Obama/Biden Administration and Fed Chair Ben Bernanke hadn't taken their economic actions. It would have been extremely ugly even now.
And in similar fashion, can you imagine how the US middle and lower economic classes will fare if the TransPacific and TransAtlantic Partnerships don't pass? It also will be ugly. These critical partnerships will keep the world economy thriving economically for many years to come, with the resultant much higher company earnings. The US Congress just needs to fulfill its role to ensure that these economic fruits are shared more fairly between the upper, middle and lower economic classes.
In viewing the very recent Democratic Presidential Debate held in Las Vegas, I thought Bernie Sanders was the clear winner of the debate. But unless something were to change, I don't think any of the 5 Democratic Presidential Candidates on the stage would stand much of a chance against someone very formidable like Marco Rubio who like Barack Obama is also fervently for the TransPacific Trade Agreement.
I do think that if Vice President Joe Biden were to enter the Presidential race, he would have a decent chance against Rubio. I think Biden, with his extensive economic experience working hand-in-hand with President Obama, has a much better understanding of what it takes for the US economy to be successful than Rubio, Sanders or Clinton and the US economy will be the key issue in the 2016 US Presidential race.
There's a misconception that the economic actions taken by the Obama/Biden Administration and the US Fed helped the largest US Companies more to recover from the 2008-9 financial meltdown than they did the smaller US Companies. However, the relative earnings and losses numbers show just the opposite is the case.
When I stratify the earlier above chart, it shows that the 100 largest US Companies with Market Caps above US$41 bil had their 2014 Total Earnings increase by 267% over 2008 and the 100 second largest US Companies with Market Caps between US$23 Bil and US$41 Bil had their 2014 Total Earnings increase by 288% over 2008. However, when I also include the 900 smaller US Companies with Market Caps between US$2.5 Bil and US$23 bil, the combined 2014 Total Earnings increase of all 1,100 US Companies explodes upwardly to a massive 1,827%.
Further, the 2014 Total Earnings Increase Over that in 2009 was 76% for the 100 largest US Companies, 137% for the second 100 largest US Companies and an incredible 1,562% for the 900 smaller US Companies.
The below chart shows this stratification:
2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | |
US GAAP | US GAAP | US GAAP | US GAAP | US GAAP | US GAAP | US GAAP | US GAAP | |
Audited | Audited | Audited | Audited | Audited | Audited | Audited | Audited | |
Net | Net | Net | Net | Net | Net | Net | Net | |
Income | Income | Income | Income | Income | Income | Income | Income | |
(Loss) | (Loss) | (Loss) | (Loss) | (Loss) | (Loss) | (Loss) | (Loss) | |
$ mils | $ mils | $ mils | $ mils | $ mils | $ mils | $ mils | $ mils | |
100 Largest (#1-#100) | 627,653 | 650,857 | 568,947 | 581,687 | 516,202 | 357,164 | 170,905 | 402,626 |
….. Earnings % Increase 2014 Over 2008 | 267% | |||||||
….. Earnings % Increase 2014 Over 2009 | 76% | |||||||
….. Earnings % Increase 2013-14 Over 2008-09 | 142% | |||||||
….. Earnings % Increase 2012-14 Over 2008-10 | 77% | |||||||
….. Earnings % Increase 2014 Over 2007 | 56% | |||||||
100 Second Largest (#101-#200) | 144,539 | 136,407 | 115,024 | 107,233 | 93,357 | 60,860 | 37,266 | 106,684 |
….. Earnings % Increase 2014 Over 2008 | 288% | |||||||
….. Earnings % Increase 2014 Over 2009 | 137% | |||||||
….. Earnings % Increase 2013-14 Over 2008-09 | 186% | |||||||
….. Earnings % Increase 2012-14 Over 2008-10 | 107% | |||||||
….. Earnings % Increase 2014 Over 2007 | 35% | |||||||
900 Smaller (#201-#1100) | 309,603 | 384,469 | 271,161 | 210,491 | 203,104 | 18,632 | (152,022) | 154,934 |
….. Earnings % Increase 2014 Over 2008 | 304% | |||||||
….. Earnings % Increase 2014 Over 2009 | 1562% | |||||||
….. Earnings % Increase 2013-14 Over 2008-09 | 620% | |||||||
….. Earnings % Increase 2012-14 Over 2008-10 | 1285% | |||||||
….. Earnings % Increase 2014 Over 2007 | 100% |
Next up ..... the twelfth hundred largest US Companies ..... #1101 through #1200.