Sunday, December 29, 2019

Waltham, Massachusetts Medical Giant Thermo Fisher Scientific's Top-Tier Executives Average Annual Pay and Employee Benefits Increase Was a Blistering 23.7% Per Year During the Past Ten Years

I think that Pete Buttigieg was the clear winner in the recent 2020 Democratic Presidential Primary Debate held in Los Angeles.  Mayor Pete very successfully warded off a vicious barrage of strange attacks from both Amy Klobuchar and Elizabeth Warren, which seemed like they were acting in desperation.

I have researched and made posts related to Top-Tier Executive Total Compensation in most of the largest companies headquartered in the four earliest 2020 Democratic Primary States ..... Iowa, New Hampshire, Nevada and South Carolina.

Then, of the 14 Super Tuesday US States holding their 2020 Democratic Presidential Primaries on March 3, 2020, I made like posts related to most of the largest Texas Companies, most of the largest Southern California companies, most of the largest technology companies headquartered in Northern California, most of the largest North Carolina Companies and most of the largest Minnesota Companies.

My research has shown that Elizabeth Warren, Bernie Sanders and Tom Steyer are all spot on when they assert that US Corporate Financial Corruption is rampant.  But the problem is that none of the three have any clue on precisely the cause or how to effectively fix this huge problem which is also the primary cause of the huge, continuing US income inequality expansion which has been occurring for decades.

But even worse, even though he is a very nice man, Joe Biden is so naive that he isn't even aware of the extent of this continuing huge US income inequality expansion or precisely its cause which has been occurring under his nose for the past forty plus years, nor is he aware of, or else has decided to ignore, just how huge the largest US tax shelters are which are located right under his nose in his home State of Delaware, mostly in one Wilmington building.

On the very negative side, voting for many years for the Annual Income Tax Loophole Extenders which dramatically increased US income inequality expansion each year were Amy Klobuchar and Joe Biden.  On the positive side, voting for many years against these same Annual Income Tax Loophole Extenders were Elizabeth Warren and Bernie Sanders.

Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren are still both saddled with their pure Medicare For All position, which is highly unpopular to US voters at large.  If either of them won the 2020 Democratic Presidential Primary, they would stand very little chance of beating Donald Trump in the 2020 Presidential general election.

So far in my research of large US Corps I have shown that their Top-Tier Executives have been rewarded continually with just enormous annual percentage increases in pay and employee benefits, mostly stock equity compensation, to the extent that the key issue to US citizens should be the huge and continuing Income Inequality Expansion which is at the core of many critical problems the US faces.

While increasing the US federal minimum wage will help here, this would be just a  mere drop in the bucket as compared to the fact that the annual percentage increase in the pay and employee benefits of Company non-executive employees are minuscule in relation to that of Company executive employees and this has been going on for decades.  When Corporate CEOs and CFOs primarily view non-executive employees as Costs rather than as People, this is what happens.  And neither political party has had the courage to take on US Corps here.

But this huge pay inequality problem also exists widely in the non-profit sector including in non-profit hospitals.  And it also exists widely in state and local governments, especially in public education.


So now I will be addressing Top-Tier Executive Compensation for five to ten years in some of the largest companies in the State of Massachusetts, one of the 14 Super Tuesday 2020 Democratic Presidential Primary US States.  Massachusetts is also home to two 2020 Democratic Presidential candidates ..... Elizabeth Warren and Deval Patrick.  

I will be doing this research mostly by stock market capitalization and thus the first Massachusetts Company that I am addressing here is the giant Medical Company Thermo Fisher Scientific.

From annual compensation information contained in Proxy Statement filings with the US SEC, the chart below shows Thermo Fisher Scientific's Top-Tier Executives Annual Total Compensation for each of the two consecutive full years of employment for the past ten years.  

Thermo Fisher Scientific's Top-Tier Executives Average Annual Pay and Employee Benefits Increase was a blistering 23.7%
 per year during the past ten years.

So who is causing these extremely high Top-Tier Executives pay percentages increases, which tend to be much higher than the Companies' actual financial performance?

And who is causing the annual minuscule raises for the company non-executive employees? 

Generally it works like this.

The Company's Board of Directors set the pay standards for the total compensation of the CEO for each year.   
  
Then the CEO establishes the pay standards for the Top-Tier Executives, which is reviewed by the Company's Board of Directors.  

And the CEO also usually approves the overall pay and employee benefits annual percentage increases for each of the other levels of the Company's employees.

So who is this huge, continuing Company pay and employee benefit income inequality "on"?

Clearly it's "on" the Company's CEO and the Company's Board of Directors.


It's simple math.  The lower the annual percentage raise for the Company's non-executive employees, the higher the Company's annual profits and thus also the higher the annual percentage raise for the Company's executives since their annual pay raise is tied to Company profits.

The end result is massive, continuing income inequality expansion.


And the only way it will be fixed is by wisely-designed US Government tax legislation, which gives companies very nice tax incentives for paying non-executive employees very well in a given year and which also requires companies to pay a luxury tax when executives are paid clearly too much in a given year or when non-executive employees are clearly paid too little in a given year.  In addition, it would be very helpful to dramatically increase the US Earned Income Tax Credit.

So, why hasn't it been fixed? 

Because more than half of the US Congress, including more than a few Democrats, are effectively controlled by the US Corps or because the US President is controlled by the US Corps who are vigorously fighting to be at the top of the list of US Corps continuing to expand income inequality.

So how do you solve that problem?

Vote for US Senators, US House members and a US President who isn't controlled by the US Corps which view their non-executive employees and contract workers as Costs rather than as People ..... they all don't, but a clear majority of them do.


It's that simple.


FYE FYE FYE FYE FYE FYE FYE FYE FYE FYE
Dec Dec Dec Dec Dec Dec Dec Dec Dec Dec
Thermo Fisher Scientific 2018 2017 2017 2016 2016 2015 2015 2014 2014 2013
Top-Tier Total Total Total Total Total Total Total Total Total Total
Executive Comp Comp Comp Comp Comp Comp Comp Comp Comp Comp
$ 000s $ 000s $ 000s $ 000s $ 000s $ 000s $ 000s $ 000s $ 000s $ 000s
Casper CEO     18,607     22,275     22,275     17,801     17,801     16,307     16,307     17,447     17,447     16,169
Williamson CFO       4,796       5,144       5,144       3,470       3,470       2,963    
Stevenson COO       8,427     12,342     12,342       6,992       6,992       6,716  N/A   N/A     
Durbin       3,927       4,283
Herrema       4,301       5,084
Wilver        3,503       3,490       3,490       4,193       4,193       4,198
Loewald       4,062       3,919       3,919       3,892       3,892       3,218
Malus        4,915       5,256       5,256       4,887
 Totals      40,058     49,128     39,761     28,263     35,828     33,395     28,631     30,788     30,788     28,472
Annual % Change vs Prior Year -18.5% 40.7% 7.3% -7.0% 8.1%
5 Year Average Per Year % Change 6.1%
FYE FYE FYE FYE FYE FYE FYE FYE FYE FYE
Dec Dec Dec Dec Dec Dec Dec Dec Dec Dec
Thermo Fisher Scientific 2013 2012 2012 2011 2011 2010 2010 2009 2009 2008
Top-Tier Total Total Total Total Total Total Total Total Total Total
Executive Comp Comp Comp Comp Comp Comp Comp Comp Comp Comp
$ 000s $ 000s $ 000s $ 000s $ 000s $ 000s $ 000s $ 000s $ 000s $ 000s
Casper CEO     16,169     13,822     13,822       5,517       5,517       2,762       2,762     34,124     34,124       9,270
Herrema       3,246       3,370       3,370       2,949    
Wilver        4,198       3,752       3,752       3,419       3,419       3,420       3,420       2,980       2,980       2,359
Loewald       3,218       2,519    
Malus        4,887       4,774       4,774       3,689       3,689       3,644       3,644       3,227       3,227       3,013
 Pesicka        4,331       4,252       4,252       3,405       3,405       3,425       3,425       3,049    
 Dekkers Former CEO   N/A   N/A 
 Totals      32,803     29,119     26,600     16,030     19,276     16,621     16,621     46,329     40,331     14,642
Annual % Change vs Prior Year 12.7% 65.9% 16.0% -64.1% 175.4%
5 Year Average Per Year % Change 41.2%
10 Year Average Per Year % Change 23.7%