I have researched and made posts related to Top-Tier Executive Total Compensation in most of the largest companies headquartered in the four earliest 2020 Democratic Primary States ..... Iowa, New Hampshire, Nevada and South Carolina.
Then, of the 14 Super Tuesday US States holding their 2020 Democratic Presidential Primaries on March 3, 2020, I made like posts related to most of the largest Texas Companies, most of the largest Southern California companies, most of the largest technology companies headquartered in Northern California and most of the largest North Carolina Companies.
My research has shown that Elizabeth Warren, Bernie Sanders and Tom Steyer are all spot on when they assert that US Corporate Financial Corruption is rampant. But the problem is that none of the three have any clue on precisely the cause or how to effectively fix this huge problem which is also the primary cause of the huge, continuing US income inequality expansion which has been occurring for decades.
But even worse, even though he is a very nice man, Joe Biden is so naive that he isn't even aware of the extent of this continuing huge US income inequality expansion or precisely its cause which has been occurring under his nose for the past forty plus years, nor is he aware of, or else has decided to ignore, just how huge the largest US tax shelters are which are located right under his nose in his home State of Delaware, mostly in one Wilmington building.
On the very negative side, voting for many years for the Annual Income Tax Loophole Extenders which dramatically increased US income inequality expansion each year were Amy Klobuchar and Joe Biden. On the very positive side, voting for many years against these same Annual Income Tax Loophole Extenders were Elizabeth Warren and Bernie Sanders.
So far in my research of large US Corps I have shown that their Top-Tier Executives have been rewarded continually with just enormous annual percentage increases in pay and employee benefits, mostly stock equity compensation, to the extent that the key issue to US citizens should be the huge and continuing Income Inequality Expansion which is at the core of many critical problems the US faces.
While increasing the US federal minimum wage will help here, this would be just a mere drop in the bucket as compared to the fact that the annual percentage increase in the pay and employee benefits of Company non-executive employees are minuscule in relation to that of Company executive employees and this has been going on for decades. When Corporate CEOs and CFOs primarily view non-executive employees as Costs rather than as People, this is what happens. And neither political party has had the courage to take on US Corps here.
But this huge pay inequality problem also exists widely in the non-profit sector including in non-profit hospitals. And it also exists widely in state and local governments, especially in public education.
So now I will be addressing Top-Tier Executive Compensation for five to ten years in some of the largest companies in the State of Minnesota, one of the 14 Super Tuesday 2020 Democratic Presidential Primary US States.
I will be doing this research mostly by stock market capitalization and thus the fifth Minnesota Company that I am addressing here is Target Corp.
From annual compensation information contained in Proxy Statement filings with the US SEC, the chart at the bottom below shows Target's Top-Tier Executives Annual Total Compensation for each of the two consecutive full years of employment for the past five years.
Target's Top-Tier Executives Average Annual Pay and Employee Benefits Increase was a blistering 19.3% per year during the past five years, which is the second highest of the five very large Minnesota Companies I have addressed so far.
- Medtronic plc +39.4% per year for the past five years
- Target +19.3% per year for the past five years
- 3M Co +18.3% per year for the past ten years
- US Bancorp +16.3% per year for the past five years
- UnitedHealth Group +9.6% per year for the past five years
And who is causing the annual minuscule raises for the company non-executive employees?
Generally it works like this.
The Company's Board of Directors set the pay standards for the total compensation of the CEO for each year.
And the CEO also usually approves the overall pay and employee benefits annual percentage increases for each of the other levels of the Company's employees.
So who is this huge, continuing Company pay and employee benefit income inequality "on"?
Clearly it's "on" the Company's CEO and the Company's Board of Directors.
It's simple math. The lower the annual percentage raise for the Company's non-executive employees, the higher the Company's annual profits and thus also the higher the annual percentage raise for the Company's executives since their annual pay raise is tied to Company profits.
The end result is massive, continuing income inequality expansion.
And the only way it will be fixed is by wisely-designed US Government tax legislation, which gives companies very nice tax incentives for paying non-executive employees very well in a given year and which also requires companies to pay a luxury tax when executives are paid clearly too much in a given year or when non-executive employees are clearly paid too little in a given year.
Why hasn't it been fixed?
Because more than half of the US Congress, including more than a few Democrats, are effectively controlled by the US Corps or because the US President is controlled by the US Corps who are vigorously fighting to be at the top of the list of US Corps continuing to expand income inequality.
So how do you solve that problem?
Vote for US Senators, US House members and a US President who isn't controlled by the US Corps which view their non-executive employees and contract workers as Costs rather than as People ..... they all don't but a clear majority of them do.
It's that simple.
And the only way it will be fixed is by wisely-designed US Government tax legislation, which gives companies very nice tax incentives for paying non-executive employees very well in a given year and which also requires companies to pay a luxury tax when executives are paid clearly too much in a given year or when non-executive employees are clearly paid too little in a given year.
Why hasn't it been fixed?
Because more than half of the US Congress, including more than a few Democrats, are effectively controlled by the US Corps or because the US President is controlled by the US Corps who are vigorously fighting to be at the top of the list of US Corps continuing to expand income inequality.
So how do you solve that problem?
Vote for US Senators, US House members and a US President who isn't controlled by the US Corps which view their non-executive employees and contract workers as Costs rather than as People ..... they all don't but a clear majority of them do.
It's that simple.
FYE | FYE | FYE | FYE | FYE | FYE | FYE | FYE | FYE | FYE | |||||
Target | 2018 | 2017 | 2017 | 2016 | 2016 | 2015 | 2015 | 2014 | 2014 | 2013 | ||||
Top-Tier | Total | Total | Total | Total | Total | Total | Total | Total | Total | Total | ||||
Executive | Comp | Comp | Comp | Comp | Comp | Comp | Comp | Comp | Comp | Comp | ||||
$ 000s | $ 000s | $ 000s | $ 000s | $ 000s | $ 000s | $ 000s | $ 000s | $ 000s | $ 000s | |||||
Brian Cornell CEO | 17,204 | 8,399 | 8,399 | 11,281 | 11,281 | 16,946 | N/A | N/A | ||||||
Cathy Smith CFO | 5,581 | 3,312 | 3,312 | 4,439 | N/A | N/A | ||||||||
John Mulligan COO | 8,576 | 4,409 | 4,409 | 7,031 | 7,031 | 10,393 | 10,393 | 6,293 | 6,293 | 4,634 | ||||
Michael McNamara Chief Information Officer | 5,356 | 3,073 | 3,073 | 4,306 | N/A | N/A | ||||||||
Don Liu Chief Legal & Risk Officer | 4,331 | 2,893 | N/A | N/A | ||||||||||
Jeffrey Jones Chief Marketing Officer | 7,673 | 4,359 | 4,359 | 4,292 | ||||||||||
Kathryn Tesija Merchandising&Supply Chain | 6,324 | 7,198 | ||||||||||||
Tina Tyler Chief Stores Officer | 4,525 | 4,680 | ||||||||||||
Gregg Steinhafel CEO | N/A | N/A | ||||||||||||
Totals | 41,048 | 22,086 | 19,193 | 27,057 | 18,312 | 27,339 | 18,066 | 10,652 | 21,501 | 20,804 | ||||
Annual % Change vs Prior Year | 85.9% | -29.1% | -33.0% | 69.6% | 3.4% | |||||||||
5 Year Average Per Year % Change | 19.3% |